Obama's healthcare plan  | | In the previous post, I listed out the health-care plan of John McCain. Now I shall list out Obama's health-care plan. Obama's health-care plan. Obama wants a national health insurance similar to the ones our politicians are getting to be available to the public. Like the congress people, they would be able to choose whether they want the national plan or not. Obama wants to make health-care plan portable. Obama wants to set up a National Health Insurance Exchange. This is a body where the government would rate the health insurance industry and allow certain insurance companies, as per the government sees fit, to sell insurance to the public. It is like an insurance company having the stamp of approval of the government. Obama wants employers that do not give their employees sufficient health coverage to contribute to the national plan. Obama wants parents to cover their children's health-care plan till the 'children' are 25. Obama wants to expand SCHIP. Obama wants to let states carry on their current health-care plans if they meet the minimum criteria of the national health care plan that Obama is offering. Obama wants to order federal re-insurance for employers so that they do not go bankrupt if an employee of that company suffers a setback. Obama wants to support disease management plans. Obama wants to coordinate and integrate care. Obama wants to make all health-care costs transparent. Obama wants to align incentives for excellence. He wants doctors to be rewarded for the good work they do and not just for the amount of work that they do. Obama wants to make it mandatory for hospitals to report preventive medical errors and support the hospital and doctors in not making the errors happen again. Obama wants to have continuous comparative reviews and research. Obama wants to reform medical malpractice while preserving patients rights. This is something like the bill of rights for both doctors and patients. Obama wants to implement IT to lower the cost of health-care in America. Obama wants to increase competition to lower costs of health-care. Obama wants to allow drug re-importation. Obama wants to increase use of generics. He also wants to go after drug companies that pay generic drug makers not to enter the market to keep their profit margin high. Obama wants to lower Medicare prescription drug benefit costs. Obama wants to get more employers to the work site health promotion programs. Obama wants to combat child obesity. Measures include getting 100% of elementary schools to have physical education and ensure that there is not too much fat in school lunches. Obama wants to help primary care providers and public health-care professionals in many issues. My analysis A few things stand out in Obama's health care plan. Firstly, it again shows his hard handed approach in going about to solve problems. A good and funny example is that of combating child obesity. He demands that all kids get Physical Education everyday! Secondly, quite a number of McCain's point can be found in Obama's health care plan too. Check that one out too to see the similarities. I am not happy that these candidates do not state the facts and the figures in the form of an accounting table and not state what are the negatives in their plan. That is so important in helping people make their minds. The last point I can make is that one can see that Obama really did do his research in coming up with this plan. He must have studied the way 3M provides health-care for her employees and Jamie Oliver's movement to re-do school lunches in UK. He has taken what works and implemented it in his health-care plan. For that Obama should really be commended for it. On a personal note, it am still not sure if universal health-care is the best for US. So even though Obama has a lot of minor points that I like, I am still reserved about universal health-care unless he shows us the $$. What I like about Obama's health care plan Like McCain's plan, I prefer a portable health-care plan. The US needs to catch up with this as it is already happening around the world. Since both candidates support this, I hope to see this in place by 2012. Co-ordinating and integrating health-care, using IT in health-care administration and making health-care transparent are some things that we obviously needs to do. I would be shocked if it is not already in place. McCain is promising the same things too. Aligning incentives for excellence makes some sense. It happens in every industry so why not for the medical sector? That being said, every life saved by a doctor is an excellent job, are we going to reward all of them? Still a good thing though. Making hospital report preventive medical errors is also common sense to me. It is done in a company so why not for the medical industry. After-all it is the industry of life and death. I would not be surprised if this is already practiced but better be safe than sorry. Comparative review and research can only help us. Reforming medical mal-practice laws are a really good idea. This is a part of Obama's plan that has an edge over McCain's. Clearly stating where the doctor and patient stand is a great way to incorporate work. Increasing use of generics is a great idea. Going after people that pay them not to come into the market, is even better. I think it is just plain wrong for pharmaceutical companies to be able to do that. It is a disgrace to competition. Can we imagine if Pentium paid AMD not to release their latest chip so that Pentium can sell its latest at a higher price? Isn't it amazing that one department of the government can negotiate to bring down the price of drugs but another branch can't? Obama wants to bring down costs incurred by Medicare drug benefits by making the government negotiate the price of the drugs. This is already done by the VA and drugs there cost the taxpayer 20% less. Why haven't the government thought about this earlier. What the hell is congress doing? Sleeping? I agree with the steps to cut down on child obesity. It is rampant and needs to be stopped. Another class act in the Obama plan is the way he is solving the dwindling primary care providers and public health-care professionals. I always been an admirer of this policy that is popular in the East. The biggest issues facing the doctors and the nurses is that their tuition loans cost too much. Making them bonded to the hospitals is a great way of cutting down government cost and lessen the worries of doctors and nurses. What I do not like about Obama's health plan If parents want to cover kids, fine. But when they start working, they should pay their own health-care. It is not fair for parents to pay for health insurances of people under the age of 25 that are already working. Getting employers to the work site health promotion programs is really not a good thing. Starbucks and 3M can do so as it has been their company culture for so many years. To get others to follow suit would increase their costs dramatically and also generally increase the cost of goods. Things that I am on the edge of We are already spending so much on health care. By giving people a national health insurance plan, wouldn't that skyrocket American expenses? Are we giving more with our left hand that we are receiving with our right. On what basis are we going to brand and grade insurance companies? How is the government going to defend against corruption and lobbyists with the National Health Insurance Exchange? How much is re-insurance for employers going to cost the tax-payer? SCHIP already cost the taxpayer more than $200 billion. How much more would it cost if it is expanded? What are the regulations tied to re-importation? Conclusion Even though Obama's plan has got more positives than negatives, glaring fiscal questions need to be answered. Furthermore, I am not yet convinced that universal health-care, a central theme in this policy would be great for the country. Obama's plan is not bad, but not that much better than McCain's shorter plan as it fails to disclose the costs that would incur with his plan. What do you think? Whose plan do you think is better?
| |
| |
| | | | Let Us Be There When You Can't Rite Response Telemessaging, A full Service Center, celebrating 17 years. Live "Quality" Answering 24/7 for Commercial, Professional, Medical, large or small. BBB Member. www.riteresponse.com
| Answer Racing Products Come see the complete line of Answer riding apparel. www.gmo1.com
| Office Suites PLUS Providing a full line of services designed to keep you and your costumers connected. Services include personalized telephone answering services as well as call screening and call forwarding. www.officesuitesplus.com
|
|
| | | | | | 1. xfahctor (2478) | 5 months ago | I'm not sure I totaly like either plan. I have said, I agrea something needs to be done, but a government solution is not nessesarily a good thing. Look at anything else they get hold of. In addition and as I stated in the thread you wrote on McCains health plan, we need to be very carefull when looking around the world at other countries who offer it. we are not like other countries. We are not only much larger than most developed nations we have a very unique system of government and fiscal systems. In short, what may work (or not depending on who you talk to) in Canada or Brittan, may be a financial and beurocratic night mare here. we are simply too big. 300 million people is a lot of people to cover. I also feel that to start dictating things that are strictly parental authority smacks of socialism and dictatorium. Parents cover 25 year old children? By the time many are 25 years old, they are parents themselves, will this then extend to grandchildren? About physical education every day, is this not a state education issue?Are we now going to strip even more of the individual states autonomy and hand even more over to the federal government? I think both plans are headed the wrong direction. They move the issue too much more towords the federal level when we should be moving more away from it. Califrnia is not New hampshire, Texas is not North Dakota. If we are going to impliment a "universal" healthcare initiative, it needds to be a state by state proccess and it needs to be a freemarket orientd process. Whats going to happen, no matter who's plan comes in to play, is it is going to falter, become very expensive ineffective and the first finger will be pointed to who ever is sitting in the white house. Well people, what do you expect, you gave it to them knowing what would happen and how it would not work. Think folks, THINK. National healthcare, brought to you by the people who brought you FEMA, the IRS, and other such shining examples of large federaly run outfits.
| |
| |
|
|
PreetSG (205) | 5 months ago | Your population argument does not hold as health care is not only a fedral issue but a local one as well. It must and can be done at city and, as the candidates recognise it, at state level. US has the 3rd highest populatuion in the world. And unlike the other 2 countries above in the population index, we do care for the health of their citizens. So I do get where your worry is coming from. But then no country in the world pay as much taxes as Americans do. I agree factors differ from a state to state basis. Alaska, New York and California can definitely pay for universal healthcare, but can Montana, Hawaii or Kansas? But that would just make the case for a federal policy even stronger. It would be havoc trying to do things at a state or city level. Furthermore, like the issue of abortion, ths would be a matter where people would literally "migrate" states to suit their needs. This would also further divide our country even further if these issues were just state policy. There should be a national, state and local level policies that work in tandem. Like the way Obama explains, guidelines set by the Federal governemnt, state make rules base on the guidelines and local level carry it out. Both ways, universal or free-market, can work and not work. It is all in the execution. Sri Lanka has universal healthcare and their system suck. Thailand has a free market healthcare and their system also suck. It is how healthcare is carried out. I am still looking for something in the middle that is still not out, or one that I have not found. I myself have mentioned that Obama's policies are rather hard handed, a do it kind of mentality. But that does not make it dictatorial. I live in a country where chewing gum is illegal and it is still a democracy not a dictatorship. It is nowhere close man. And lets cut the govenment some slack man. Yes they gave us FEMA and IRS, but they also gave us NASA, USAF and VA. We still have the best system of government on earth and are the envy of many. They still do not shoot dissenters like you and me. This is the privelege that we have and often forget.
| |
|
|
xfahctor (2478) | 5 months ago | "But then no country in the world pay as much taxes as Americans do." I don't know that I'd say that. I dated a girl in Ontario for almost 3 years. She was what we would consider here, lower income and as a single mother, was paying almost 40% of her income in provincial and federal taxes and the healthcare she got, was still incomplete. there is a lot the canadian system doesn't pay and it is increasingly falling on the people to pay more of their own costs. Perscription drugs are not coverd, neither is dental or optical. In addition,,any proceedures are now requiring a co pay, such as lab work. this system too is beginnign to colaps on itself and they are only covering 1 10th of what we are going to have to. did you read in your other thread the post I left? I put a lot of my thoughts there and probably outline my concerns better there. I'm not saying nothing needs to be done, just that we need to be VERY VERY carefull in how we do it and it's scale. this is something that if we botch, it will be a BIG botch, larger than anything we have broken so far and far harder to fix than anything we have broken before. granted it is in need of repairs right now, trust me, there is still FAR more damage we can do to it if we are not carefull and thought full in how we go about it.
| |
|
| | Let Us Be There When You Can't Rite Response Telemessaging, A full Service Center, celebrating 17 years. Live "Quality" Answering 24/7 for Commercial, Professional, Medical, large or small. BBB Member. www.riteresponse.com | add comment |
|
| | | | Internet Answering Machine Catch-A-Call allows you to receive and answer incoming calls and faxes while you are online. No need for a second phone line. Satisfaction guaranteed. www.gadgetshack.com
| Answers To Iqtest Com Think You've Got a High IQ? Take Our IQ Test Now. www.InstantIntelligenceTest.com
| Closeout Answer Edge Jersey BETTER prices, GREAT service, FAST shipping& AWESOME closeout DEALS. www.MotorcycleCloseouts.com
|
| | | |
| Internet Answering Machine Catch-A-Call allows you to receive and answer incoming calls and faxes while you are online. No need for a second phone line. Satisfaction guaranteed. www.gadgetshack.com | |
Answers To Iqtest Com Think You've Got a High IQ? Take Our IQ Test Now. www.InstantIntelligenceTest.com | |
Closeout Answer Edge Jersey BETTER prices, GREAT service, FAST shipping & AWESOME closeout DEALS. www.MotorcycleCloseouts.com | |
|