| | | | web | myLot | discussions | blogs | news | photosmessages | | |
|
|
|
|
Should Gandhiji have been awarded Nobl Prize?  | | Hey Guys what do you think should gandhiji have been awarded Noble Prize? Though it is seem to be true that,some people get prestige because they get an award,But some people are there if they are awared with award that award get prestige.and gandhiji comes in later category.But still ifeel that he should have been awarded with Noble prize. What is your opinion?
| |
| |
| | | | | | | | 1. drd_ebiz (80)  | 1 year ago | Absolutely no doubt about it, even to ask th Q that should Gandhiji desrved a nobl prize, raise a question mark about the sincerity of the questioner (plz dnt tke it otherwise). Gandhiji was the other name of peace, he simply symbolizes peace, harmony, tranquility ...all the best of bests humane qualities. Look, people who followed his foot step dilligently (his proteges) like Marthin Luthar King, Nelson Mandella, even Dalai Lama are nobl laureates....& their master/guru was not even considered. Man, I doubt the credibilty of this Alfred nobel trust. If Gandhiji dint desrv it then nobody do so. .. today if you make a list of great souls, who advocated peace and humanity, from the begining of known human history, Gandhiji will find his place in the first slot very very easily...tell me what is the credential of this Alfred Nobel trust or committee or whatever? Ok somebody will tell that while his name was being cnsidered, he died most unfortunately and nobel prize is not awarded posthumously. Man Gandhiji came to lime light with full vigour and sparkle about 30 years before his death. What was nobel committee doing during that period? Was it under influence of Churchill or some body else....? I guess this whole episode is a big big irony in our modern history, in fact it should be cnsidered a scam, & nobel committee should come out wth all th facts and they should issue a public apology to the people of india and the followers of Gandhiji all over the world.
| |
| |
|
|
kriskhedkar (362) | 1 year ago | yes,i agree with you but it should be no hard and fast rule that Noble Prize should not be awarded posthumously.ANd its ok even if he did not got noble prize.Come on Lets give him Noble prize by implementing his thoughts in our day to day life even if we will be able to do so it wille more than a noble prize.
| |
|
|
| deep25btech (6) | 1 year ago | i have doudt tht whetehr gadji shoul win noble prize.after aall he did..still he is responsible for didvinding our country..that time he was silent..and threr were so many things he could did diffrently..but all in all he was a good man..and surely indais father of nation..but to win a nabole...u jhave to do things like robin did..or mother teresa did
| |
|
| | Can You Really Make Money Online? How To Tell A Scam From The Real Thing Free Newsletter Shows You How. homebaseprofits.com | add comment |
|
| | 2. sean1986 (448) | 1 year ago | Yes,he should have been awarded a nobel prize for peace. But wonder whether he would have accepted it before India's Independence. He died soon after India obtained freedom. But who considers a nobel price in peace as to be the basis of any glory.Its not the award but the work done to make the world a better place that is remembered. Gandhi's legacy lives on around the world.
| |
| |
|
| | | | | |  neeraj05 (115) | | he always teached good thought throughout his life | |
|  | |
 Dasari100 (677) | | I am proud to tell he is my country and he did everything for his nation and he used to implement lot of plans against those people and he gave his best to the nation and we showed us great path with... | |
| |
 eldhose (3) | | Some people is having the opinion that gandhi is fully responsible for the division of india into two states in 1947...Actually he had done a lot for the independence of india...what do u think..is... | |
| |
 senjacob (51) | | can anyone know whether mahatma does great things for our nation.and also explain ahimsa is a correct way to treat our enemy | |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|